Jacob's Final Portfolio
Freshman Year: Literary Analysis
Night by Elie Wiesel is a novel about Wiesel’s struggles during the Holocaust. Wiesel uses in depth detail to describe events he witnessed and experienced. Night details how Wiesel was first separated from his mother and sister. It then explains how he lost his father and ended up being liberated. Throughout the novel, Wiesel depicts the loss of faith of the Jews due to their inhumane treatment by the Nazis during World War II.
Wiesel is able to describe God so that he is in a way absent from these Jews’ lives. Wiesel recalls, “My eyes had opened and I was alone, terribly alone in a world without God” (68). He no longer feels the presence of God, and Elie has seemingly lost his faith. Elie also mentions a Jewish rabbi from Poland who desperately said, “It’s over, God is no longer with us” (76). The fact that someone so devoted to religion that they would become a rabbi would say something like this is very surprising and shows how desperate the Jews’ situation had become. Clearly if a rabbi could lose his faith, anyone could.
Elie also describes how God is becoming trivial to him by how he compares him to man. Elie believes, “man is very strong, greater than God” (67). Elie is no longer placing his faith in God, but instead in men. Elie also describes how he feels in comparison to God, saying, “ I felt myself to be stronger than this Almighty to whom my life had been bound for so long” (68). Not only does Elie feel he is more important than God, but he appears to be angry that he had been faithful for “so long” (68).
Elie also refuses to praise God’s name and bless him. Elie does this on at least two separate occasions. On the first he says, “Blessed be God’s name? Why should I bless Him” (67). He no longer feels the need to thank God and pray to him. He is defiant towards God and refuses to continue to accept him. The next quote expresses more anger: “How could I say to Him: Blessed be Thou, Almighty Master of the Universe, who chooses us among all nations to be tortured day and night” (67). Elie is very spiteful towards God and questions how he can bless a God that shows no concern for his people. Elie continues on by saying, “Praised be a Thy Holy Name for having chosen us to be slaughtered on Thine altar” (67). Elie has lost all faith and no longer believes in God’s reason., maybe not even God himself.
Elie tries to be rebellious towards God. He even remembers, “As I swallowed my ration of soup, I turned that action of a symbol of rebellion” (69). Elie is so furious with God that he is able to turn eating soup into an act of defiance and a sign of his loss of faith.
Throughout the memoir Night by Elie Wiesel, multiple depictions of the loss of faith of the Jews are made. Wiesel not only depicts his own loss of faith, but also the loss of faith of others. Wiesel shows that all men can lose faith in desperate times by informing the reader of a Polish rabbi who believed “God is no longer with us” (76). Throughout Night, Wiesel is able to inform the reader of how inhumane the Nazis’ actions were, and how these actions led to the loss of faith of the Jews during this time in history.
Sophomore Year: Star Wars Research Paper
Star Wars is a famous movie series that was written by George Lucas. The films take place in an unknown galaxy across a number of different fictional worlds. The Star Wars series is composed of the original trilogy as well as three prequels. A set of three sequels to the original trilogy is also in the making. The movies have inspired an extensive amount of other media including books, comic books, videogames, and television shows. In the Star Wars films, deeper development of essential characters as well as the plot is heavily dependent on archetypal elements.
Before one can discern the archetypes of certain characters of the series, he or she must have an understanding of what an archetypal analysis is. The approach attempts to view stories as myths containing recurring archetypes. These archetypes serve as models for reproduction, such as the classic hero. There are a number of different archetypes, including the previously mentioned hero, the villain, the outcast, and more. The approach was created and developed by Carl Jung who believed these archetypes were a product of what he called the “collective unconscious.” This he believed was the shared knowledge and experience of mankind’s ancestors that had been passed down. Jung believed it to not only be a part of literature, but relevant to everyday life, stating in his book, The Structure of the Psyche: All the most powerful ideas in history go back to archetypes, This is particularly true of religious ideas, but the central concepts of science, philosophy, and ethics are no exception to this rule. In their present form they are variants of archetypal ideas created by consciously applying and adapting these ideas to reality. (Cherry)
Besides archetypal characters, there are archetypal situations and symbols. The quest of a hero is a common occurrence and often follows a similar pattern of peril with a final triumph. Archetypal symbols often contrast with each other, such as water representing life, while the desert is a symbol of emptiness and void of life. These ideas of archetypes were expanded upon by Joseph Campbell who focused on similarities in religion and mythology.
Through his work in comparing different stories and religions, Joseph Campbell developed his explanation of what he called the “monomyth.” The monomyth identifies that all of these stories follow an essentially identical pattern. He breaks down this pattern, which deals with the hero’s journey, into three parts. The first part is the departure, followed by the initiation, and rounded off with the return. Campbell wrote about the monomyth in his book The Hero with a Thousand Faces. George Lucas used this book to help him in writing the script for Star Wars (Brennan). Lucas was then able to incorporate a number of archetypal elements into the original movie, and later the rest of the series.
Perhaps the most vital element of the plot is the inclusion of the archetypal situation of the fight between good and evil. Lucas incorporates good and evil into the films through the Force as well the outside struggles of different factions. The Force is balanced by two sides that are constantly at odds in an apparent black and white battle. The light side is the obvious representation of good while the dark side represents evil. The struggle between the light side and the dark side is a yin and yang situation in which neither side is made out to be more powerful than the other (Greydanus). Despite this, a clear distinction is made between the two sides, and the lure of the dark side is seen to be irresistible as one gets pulled closer in, a reference to the archetypal symbolism of darkness as despair. The balance of the Force is also a vital part of the plot, referenced by Obi Wan Kenobi in Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith, “You were the chosen one! It was said that you would destroy the Sith, not join them. You were to bring balance to the Force, not leave it in darkness.” (Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith). Additional factions are also pitted against each other in the fight between good and evil. In the prequels, the Republic is the inherently good party while the Confederacy represents evil. The same can be said about the Rebels and the Empire in the original trilogy. The Rebels are in an overwhelmingly difficult war and must overcome tremendous disadvantages to defeat the mighty and evil Empire. Although the battle between good and evil is apparent, Star Wars is not simply a tale of these two sides.
Star Wars incorporates Anakin Skywalker and his other identity, Darth Vader, into the story as a hero’s tragic fall. Anakin first appears in the series as a young boy on his home world of Tatooine. One soon learns that Anakin has immense potential and will eventually be labeled as the Chosen One. Anakin can be observed as adventurous and unafraid of danger through his podracing. Anakin’s heroic journey begins after his departure from home in order to go train to become a Jedi. Anakin goes through his training, being brought up as a Jedi and a man of peace and order. It becomes apparent that Anakin lacks emotional discipline, a concept that is stressed greatly by the Jedi. Not only does he lack discipline, he also appears to have emotional instability and displays signs of borderline personality disorder as well as a variety of several other psychological disorders (Dotinga). Anakin acts out of anger and hatred, slaughtering the sand people that kidnapped his mother and also later experiencing the other extreme - and forbidden - emotion, love.
Anakin falls for Padme Amidala, a situation that later influences his fall to the dark side due to his desire to protect her. Anakin also is shown as arrogant and overconfident in both his current and potential power. He comes to see out the confrontation of Chancellor Palpatine even though Mace Windu specifically implores him not to. Anakin rescues the Chancellor from certain death, and it is at this point his fall occurs. Anakin kills Windu and assumes the place by Palpatine’s side as his apprentice, Darth Vader. Anakin’s fall is a loss of innocence as a guardian of the light into the transition of a Sith and a master of the dark side.
Before Anakin’s transition can be complete, he must undergo some sort of drastic change. This is achieved by taking advantage of the common archetypal situation of nature versus machine. Vader is drastically disfigured and loses multiple limbs in a confrontation with his former master, Obi Wan Kenobi, near the end of the film, Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith. He loses his ability to live naturally, descending into darkness as a mechanically dependent individual, disconnected from human life (Hill).
Vader possesses a unique archetypal role in that not only is he a fallen hero, but he is also a villain with inherent goodness inside of him. This role allows Vader to be developed as a formidable, intelligent, and powerful opponent before finally transitioning back into a noble and righteous individual by saving his son, Luke, and killing the Emperor. Despite deep, and coherent development of Anakin, his quest is not the only significant hero’s journey present in the film series.
Anakin’s son Luke Skywalker also embarks on a heroic quest during part of the Star Wars series. Luke is born, along with his twin sister Leia, at the end of Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith. Their mother Padme dies during childbirth, and the twins are also separated for their own safety. Luke is taken to live with relatives on Anakin’s home planet of Tatooine. Luke grows up with his aunt and uncle, while Obi Wan remains close by. Luke soon becomes involved in a journey that is structured in the way of the classic monomyth.
Luke’s journey begins in the departure stage of the monomyth. Luke is asked by Obi-Wan to accompany him to Alderaan as well as to learn the ways of the force. Luke initially refuses this call, saying that he has work to do, and he needs to return home. Luke, Obi-Wan and the two droids come across the giant sandcrawler belonging to the jawas that sold the droids to Luke. They see that it has been attacked, and Obi-Wan informs them that it could only have been done by Imperial stormtroopers. Luke comes to a sudden realization and races back home. He finds his home has been burned and destroyed. Luke searches frantically for his aunt and uncle, ultimately finding their smoldering remains. He then accepts the call to adventure, making the decision to leave with Obi-Wan, the wise old man that brings supernatural aid and attempts to teach these powers to Luke.
The next stage of Luke’s journey is the initiation, and it is to be long and difficult, filled with many trials and challenges. Luke’s first major obstacle is figuring out a way to escape the Death Star and then later destroy it. He is also forced to overcome the loss of Obi-Wan and must continue without his wisdom.
Luke’s perils continue in the The Empire Strikes Back, immediately having to deal with being taken by a wampa, nearly freezing to death, and an Imperial attack on the Rebel base on Hoth. His next trial is the training he endures with Yoda. Although beneficial, the training is difficult and is incomplete when he leaves to try to rescue Han Solo and the others. Luke encounters Vader and is utterly defeated in their duel. Luke also loses his hand and learns Vader is his father in the process. Luke’s resolve is tested in how he responds to this new knowledge as well as Vader tempting him to join the dark side. Luke resists and is rescued by Leia as he dangles on the edge of life and death.
Luke is presented with his greatest trial in the final film of the saga. After turning himself in to the Empire, Luke is challenged by himself in the sense that he must overcome his emotions in his second duel with Vader as well as once again resist the temptations of the dark side. Luke acts in anger striking at Vader who speaks about turning Leia to the dark side. Luke severs his father’s hand and looks on with terror as he makes the connection between himself and his father (Biography). He realizes he is on the brink of falling to the dark side as Anakin once did. Luke casts away his saber, establishing himself as a Jedi and prevailing over his final challenge (Biography). Vader in turn saves Luke’s life as the Emperor electrocutes him. Luke then comes to experience atonement with his father, another one of the possible major elements of the monomyth. Luke’s road of perils and challenges also ends upon the death of the Emperor and the destruction of the second Death Star which follows shortly after, concluding the initiation stage of his journey. His journey is then finished as the final stage of the monomyth is complete with his newly free ability to live as he wishes and bestow his knowledge on others.
Throughout the original trilogy, Luke develops in a way that parallels Anakin in the prequels. Luke is the adventurous young man his father once was, seeking to make something more of himself than being a simple farmer on Tatooine. Also, Luke and Anakin are both trained by Obi-Wan as well as begin relatively old for Jedi standards when their training begins. Both characters are also similar in emotional aspects, influencing many of their decisions and actions, such as rushing to save loved ones in danger. Both characters also lose a hand in a lightsaber duel. Vader loses his again when fighting Luke, and it is here the major distinction between the two can be made. While Anakin gives in to anger and revenge multiple times during the films, Luke remains clear-headed and avoids the temptations of the dark side, establishing himself as a Jedi with the determination to serve the light (Twitchell).
Obi-Wan Kenobi is another major archetypal character present in Star Wars. He is also instrumental to the story, appearing in all six of the movies. Kenobi’s timeline in the saga takes him from a young man and padawan all the way until beyond his death, as he appears as a specter. He demonstrates that he is proficient in combat and with the Force, defeating opponents such as Darth Maul and serving in the Clone Wars. Very early in the series Kenobi extends his leadership role to be Anakin’s mentor. His relationship with Anakin is better described as big brother-little brother, seen by the powerful moment in which Obi-Wan says, “You were my brother Anakin. I loved you.” (Lucas). Obi-Wan fails to keep Anakin on the right path, but he later becomes a mentor yet again, as well as a wise old man, passing his knowledge and judgment on to Luke during both life and death.
Yoda is another character that represents the classic wise old man archetype. Yoda demonstrates his wisdom and deeper understanding of situations throughout the saga, remaining relatively unchanged as a character once his archetype is established. He also displays strength and capability in physical combat, fighting both Count Dooku and Emperor Palpatine. Yoda later directly trains Luke as his second mentor, passing knowledge of the Force on to the hopeful Jedi. The Jedi Master also demonstrates other archetypal roles as well, such as the trickster (Lopez). Yoda doesn’t initially tell Luke that he is Yoda in order to test Luke’s patience. Yoda also represents the mother archetype, living in the swamp surrounded by natural elements, including his own home (Brunn).
Directly contrasting Yoda is Palpatine who occupies a devil persona archetype. Palpatine is the clear figure of evil in the films, and his actions are rooted in biblical stories. He portrays the antichrist, rising to power during the crisis created by the Trade Federation. He is hailed as supposedly great, honest, and moral leader while secretly being the cause of the blockade. Palpatine also takes measures to ensure his power while also attempting to plunge the galaxy into a civil war. He succeeds in creating a war in which he controls both sides, the Separatists and the Republic. His evil continues to rise with the extermination of the Jedi using Order 66. Palpatine can also be seen as Satan in the way in which he tempts Anakin with the knowledge of preventing death, similar to when Satan is said to have tempted Adam with forbidden knowledge. Palpatine remains this evil, devilish ruler of the galaxy until cast down the reactor shaft in a similar fashion to Lucifer’s plunge into the pit (Keko).
Han Solo is the classic anti-hero of Star Wars. Han is fiercely independent, working as a smuggler and initially unconcerned by the affairs of the Rebels. Han’s independence is directly visible in his name, Solo, which references his self-reliance and lack of companionship, aside from his loyal Wookie companion Chewbacca (Lopez). Han’s loyalty is immediately called into question after receiving his money and leaving before the attack on the Death Star. Han however returns to save Luke from Vader and help ensure the destruction of the first Death Star. Han continues to display his arrogant, carefree, reckless attitude throughout the original trilogy while simultaneously maturing and learning to be more concerned about others. Ultimately, Han becomes an accomplished Rebel general as well as Leia’s love interest, concluding his journey from self-reliance to one who can place others before himself (Lopez).
Leia is yet another character that fills multiple archetypal roles. Leia is originally the typical damsel in distress, but upon being released, she proves to be very atypical. After being rescued, Leia establishes herself as woman warrior during the group’s escape from the Death Star (Lopez). She goes on to establish herself as an archetypal mother, offering support and guidance to Luke as well as taking a leadership role in the Rebel Alliance. As Luke’s twin, Leia also represents the feminine part of his character, and this unification shows a completion of their characters (Brunn). This female element represented by Leia is known as the anima (Cherry). Lastly, Leia serves as Han’s lover, completing her broad archetypal roles.
Lucas is able to create a cohesive and deeper story by incorporating archetypal elements into both the characters and the plot. The Star Wars story is both a hero’s journey and a constant struggle of good and evil. Beyond the heroes Anakin and Luke, many other characters also fall into archetypes. In many cases Lucas provides these characters with multiple archetypes, adding to their depth and importance. Once fitted with a basic archetype or multiple archetypes, Lucas is then able to provide characters with additional development, adding a sound level of realism to the fantastical universe he has created.
Junior Year: Stem Cell Research Paper
Stem cell research has become one of the most widely debated topics in the world of science. Many people already have their own misconceptions of what stem cell research actually is. Although many support the potential of this field of research, they may be unaware of the details and benefits of the process. Others still view the practice as immoral and even murderous, believing life starts at conception. This opinion diminishes the true potential of stem cell therapy. There are different types of stem cells with unique properties and benefits. Stem cell research and therapy has advanced through time and will continue to advance, offering scientific and medical benefits that outweigh any misconceptions of morality issues.
Before exploring the issue, it is important to describe what stem cells are and where they come from. Stem cells are unspecialized cells that have the unique ability to develop into other specialized cells (“Stem Cell Basics"). Some examples of specialized cells would include muscle cells, blood cells, and neurons. Stem cells also have the unique abilities of replicating many times and regenerating other types of tissue, setting them apart from other cell types (“Stem Cell Research"). Specialized cells do not have this ability, and some cell types do not reproduce at all. Aside from regenerative abilities, stem cells are also important in human development, giving rise to all other specialized cell types (“Stem Cell Basics"). Multiple types of stem cells exist, and all of them share three basic properties: the ability to divide and reproduce for lengthy periods of time, an unspecialized nature, and the ability to cause the development of specialized cells (“Stem Cell Basics").
Despite basic similarities, all stem cells are not identical. Embryonic stem cells were the first discovered and have remained promising because of their pluripotent nature, meaning they have the ability to give rise to almost any type of cell in the body (“Stem Cell Research"). Their origin, however, makes them controversial. Embryonic stem cells come from an embryo but are usually the product of an egg fertilized in vitro. Embryonic stem cell lines are grown in culture dishes and repeatedly transferred as the cells divide and reproduce. This process, if done correctly, can produce millions of pluripotent stem cells. The stem cells can eventually be induced by the introduction of chemicals or genes to differentiate into specific specialized cell types as directed, offering a method of repairing damaged tissues and treating many diseases (“Stem Cell Quick Reference").
Contrasting embryonic stem cells are adult stem cells. Whereas embryonic stem cells are involved in development of the embryo, adult stem cells are used by the body for repair of tissues (“Stem Cell Basics"). These unspecialized cells have great potential in the medical world because they are not controversial in the way embryonic stem cells are. Adult stem cells, also referred to as somatic or body stem cells, are found as unspecialized cells in various tissues and organs such as the brain, skin, liver, muscles, and the heart (“Stem Cell Basics"). Adult stem cells are unlike embryonic stem cells in that they can not proliferate, or reproduce rapidly, for long periods of time. They are also generally found in small quantities, making it difficult to produce large stem cell lines from adult stem cells (“Stem Cell Basics"). Lastly, adult stem cells generally also have less of an ability than embryonic stem cells to produce other specialized cells. Despite this, it is possible for adult stem cells to be made to behave like embryonic stem cells.
Induced pluripotent stem cells have become a recent and important milestone in stem cell research. Induced pluripotent stem cells, or iPSCs, are cells that have been altered through the use of genes and other factors to behave like embryonic stem cells and were first discovered in humans in 2007 (“Stem Cell Basics"). If iPSCs can be shown to behave as embryonic stem cells when used for therapy, this would not only offer medical benefits, but it would eliminate the controversy of using stem cells derived from an embryo. The only setback is this method has not been thoroughly tested. Subjecting cells to genetic changes has the potential to lead to negative effects such as cancer, which has been seen in some animals studied (“Stem Cell Basics").
The last major method of use for stem cells being researched is therapeutic cloning. After being discovered in 2013, therapeutic cloning has become the most recently identified of the aforementioned applications (“Stem Cell Quick Reference"). Therapeutic cloning is not the same as reproductive cloning in which the goal is to create a genetic copy of an organism. The goal of therapeutic cloning is “creating patient-specific embryonic stem cells” (“Stem Cell Quick Reference"). This is done by removing the nucleus of one of the patient’s somatic cells and then transferring it to a fertilized egg that has had its nucleus removed (“Stem Cell Quick Reference"). By doing this, as the embryo develops, it produces cells that are genetically identical to the patient. The stem cells can then be harvested from the developing embryo and used to produce patient-specific stem cell lines. This method of using stem cells is promising in that it offers a way of regenerating tissue and treating diseases without fear of rejection; the new tissue would be a genetic match of the patient’s existing tissue (“Stem Cell Quick Reference"). Therapeutic cloning is not the only medically beneficial type of stem cell use. All other stem cells offer medical advantages.
Stem cells offer a unique approach to medicine with the potential to cure unresolved illnesses and treat serious injuries. Some of these diseases or conditions include: Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, spinal cord injuries, strokes, and damaged organs (“Stem Cell Research”). Adult stem cells are useful only for specific treatments depending on the cell type because of their limited ability to differentiate into other cell types. An example of this is adult stem cells from the blood or bone marrow being widely used to treat illnesses dealing with the blood (“Stem Cell Quick Reference”). These treatments are not all that new; transplanting bone marrow stem cells is a process that has been going on for decades (“Stem Cell Debate”). Embryonic stem cells offer a greater range of possibilities than adult stem cells due to their pluripotent nature. They can be used to regenerate tissue that once lost cannot be repaired, such as nerves, meaning there could be treatments for previously untreatable injuries or diseases. Induced pluripotent stem cells have the same potential for treatment as embryonic stem cells because iPSCs are also pluripotent, as suggested by the name. Going forward iPSCs may even replace embryonic stem cells because they would eliminate controversy and have a slight advantage over embryonic stem cells; iPSCs can be made from a patient’s own cells, meaning they would not be rejected by the immune system (“Stem Cell Quick Reference”). This would make the use of iPSCs similar to therapeutic cloning in the creation of patient-specific stem cells and more cost effectively (“Stem Cell Quick Reference”).
As often happens in the medical world, there are some who oppose stem cell research and applications, while a great deal of people retain common misconceptions. The main argument against stem cells is one with a moral undertone. Many questions about the morality of stem cell research have been raised, namely does life begin at conception or birth (“Stem Cell Debate”). For some, the idea of destroying an embryo for research is viewed as murder (“Embryonic”). Others may argue that the use of stem cells is attempting at “trying to play God” (“Stem Cell Research”). Some are also fearful that the use of stem cells may lead to the highly questionable practice of cloning humans (“Stem Cell Research”). Most of these arise from misconceptions and can be easily clarified.
The idea that stem cell therapies are attempting to play god is an unsubstantiated claim used to target a valid field of the scientific and medical world. This statement can be applied to any form of medicine, making it a poor argument against the use of stem cells. Almost no one would reject conventional forms of medicine as attempts at playing God. The idea that a specific field of medicine or research should be treated differently is unreasonable. As with medicine in general, the purpose of stem cell research and applications is to create new and improved treatments to help improve the quality and length of a patient’s life.
The potential for stem cell research to lead to human cloning is another argument against stem cells that holds no real merit. The process of therapeutic cloning may be similar to the process of reproductive cloning, but the fertilized egg is never implanted in a surrogate mother, making the production of a clone impossible. Scientists are also prohibited from attempting this as it has been made illegal to do so (“Myths”). Intentional clones could therefore only be produced through illegal research that would fall outside of the normal practices of the scientific community, meaning blame would rest solely on the individual(s) responsible. With the prohibition of the production of clones and the impossibility of accidental ones developing from cells used for therapeutic cloning, there is no risk that stem cell research would lead to human cloning.
The idea that stem cell research is murder is a falsehood arising from personal opinion and misunderstandings. The idea that stem cell research is murder because of the prevalence of embryonic stem cells is the result of the belief that life starts at conception and ignorance of stem cell origin. Embryonic stem cells do not come from aborted fetuses as some may believe. As previously stated, embryonic stem cells come from in vitro fertilization. They are the result of couples that decided to no longer store the embryos or embryos that had been rejected during implantation (“Myths”). Embryonic stem cell lines can also be created by taking a single cell from early in the developmental stages of the embryo (“Myths”). Regardless of the origin of stem cells used in research, one who believes in life beginning at conception will always view stem cell research as murder. From a biological standpoint this may have some technical truth, but when dealing with eggs fertilized externally that have been rejected by a surrogate mother, this potential for life becomes absent. In clearer terms, “The embryos used to create embryonic stem cell lines were already destined to be destroyed” (“Myths”). Because of this, stem cell research is actually the opposite of murder. It takes an embryo that was going to be destroyed and changes it to something with the potential to save or enhance the lives of others. In some ways, it is analogous to organ donation. Like an organ donor whose organs can be used to save the lives of others but can no longer function together in the individual, stem cells may allow a rejected embryo to save the lives of others by repairing and regenerating tissue.
Research and use of stem cells has been a heavily debated topic for some time, but as discoveries and advancements in the field has occurred, these debates have become outdated. More ethical methods of obtaining embryonic stem cells have helped to remove much of the controversy surrounding the issue while the discovery of new stem cell types such as iPSCs may also help to eliminate any lingering concerns. While much is still left to discover, it is clear the potential medical benefits offered by stem cells are extensive. Going forward, it is important to continue to research all types of stem cells to learn more about their medical potential.